Freelancing Work as a hobby - it's better, freelance or office? When the author of another article about the pros and cons of freelancing compares the office version of the work and freelancing - mostly comparison comes around "basic concepts" such as time and money. Sometimes Issues such as "freedom", "diversity of life", "comfort" and the like. However, rarely can find mention of such important conditions as a general interest in the work that makes life more interesting, saturated (when the work - first and foremost a hobby, you see, is happiness!). Results of surveys conducted among the audience portal Allsana. ru, as well as among the audience of partner sites that are not associated with the sanatorium services, confirm the theory that the interest in this work can be a very important point, which affects the overall well-being, zest for life, etc. And what about the process of work, which often takes a lot of strength. Find suitable job for today is difficult. Everyone knows that the intensity loads, but interesting to do, which is something more and more important for the working person, rather than just a means to income, less exhausting than, for example, hated the work that brings no pleasure, just annoying. High workload, which often involves the work of freelancers bring much less discomfort than the well-known "working times" faced by their "office counterparts, namely, constant stress, incompetent colleagues and, sometimes, individual services, ill-defined points related, such as deficiencies in the system of communication between departments and divisions. Think about running for the job interviews, job search is often very debilitating. Polls on leisure among office workers show interesting results - the majority of respondents wants to escape from the office, not to discover hitherto unknown aspects of life in the lap of Nature.
Defended 101, 2004). As the society suffers destradicionalizaes daily, as effect, autonomy to the citizens is guaranteed to filter the information that receive. The current society understands that the search for preserving the past without reflection is inconceivable. The defended tradition of traditional form is seen as irrefletido fundamentalismo, and as such, unhealthy. Soon, reflectivity also is synonymous of a bigger human development (GIDDENS, 1994). As> internal world external world then is abolished (BERGER; LUCKMANN, 1995; VIGOTSKI, 1999; WALNUT, 2001). The human being, as to be gregrio that it is, alone must be thought> is the proper condition of our thought, at the same time where is half to represent the reality (IBEZ, 2004, P. 46). Being a vehicle surely notable of expression of the significant contents of the citizens, also of the o agreement necessary to understand its circles of interaction. The speech passes to be understood thus, as the linguistic set that supports and stimulates these social relations. The language and the speech pass to be seen, not only a form of disarticulated and untied expression, but as an interchange where the joints of the power and knowing if reveal (IIGUEZ, 2004; FOULCAULT, 1977). This also is one of the reasons for which social construcionismo includes in its studies> questioning the estimated ones of the essencialismo, the social construcionista theory dislocated the focus of the attention of the person for the social domain (WALNUT, 2001, P. 146). This means that, differently of other theories that naturalize the phenomena created by the proper man, the Construcionismo criticizes the traditional models, problematizando them with inquiries in its partner-historical roots (BOCK, 2004; CURED, 2008). The social phenomena then are problematizados ...

Recent Comments