11/21/2013

NEXT POST
World Bank Suppose a State that have made due, for example, according to the World Bank, has established a basic legal system, maintained a non-distortionary policy environment, including macroeconomic stability; invested in basic social services and infrastructure, protected vulnerable groups and defended the environment. Suppose a State achieved through policies and aggressive reforms, controlling inflation, lower rates of interest to acceptable levels, lower unemployment to understandable levels, opening its economy, privatize unnecessarily estatizadas companies or de-monopolize the construction of infrastructure, the provision of good part of public services, social services and other goods and services that have been inefficientcreate institutional imperative, strong and non-arbitrary basis, protect, in due form, the public order after having agreed peace with insurgent groups, protect property, put an end to economic insecurity at home (avoiding the misery in the) old-age pensions through pension systems, helping to cope with catastrophic diseases through health insurance and providing assistance in the event of loss of work, with unemployment insurance), control corruption, broaden citizen participation a good part of democratic bodies and, in the end, that manages to close the wide gap between expected of him and their own ability to timely responseaccommodating, as the World Bank itself has said its functions to its capacity. IE imagine a State that distils optimism and be attractive for investment. Good, isn't it? Now imagine what would happen then. Before as efficiently and as good conditions it is no exaggeration to foresee the massive coming of foreign investment. Neither us would seem strange that domestic investors, rather than be producing jobs and development in foreign countries return to bring his talk. Then the optimism takes over the market. Enthusiasm is effervescent and makes avisorar for near future, accelerated growth between a 7 u 8 per cent per annum. Interest rates go down, having much...
PREVIOUS POST
Communication Seen From Culture This summary was created to express the importance of culture as an axis of communication and vice versa. Culture is a process that builds on the basis of the interaction that allows the man to the construction of a society and the definition of the conditions necessary to live, hence to the media today, constitute a very important part of the culture and its expansion. That is why in our times cannot be thinking or understanding communication if it is not part of the culture. Since each of these parties merely communicate and express the culture which we belong. From there was born a phrase with which I can explain the subject to be treated: as to publicize the culture if us men fail to communicate between if. The functioning of human societies is possible thanks to the communication. That is why it is impossible to talk about communication and the communicative processes when not speaking culture and vice versa, since it has always been the communicative phenomena as part of a particular culture. Communication and culture and the great study behind them occupy a wide range of research that prevail until today this encloses without explorations numbers ranging from national policy to Telenovelas Latinoamericanas. Speaking of completely generalized terms about communication and culture is very easy to convert these two terms in ambiguous conjunctions, for this reason is more complicated to find which of the two is everything, or which is more complicated in comparison with the other. After my reading criticism and trying to analyse in depth a topic as complicated, I discovered something very important within this document to be a problem that affects us frequently, so try to be as clear as possible starting with the basics: our culture forge us - individuals - us will...

Recent Comments